Tuesday , March 31 2020

SC orders arrest of Shah Hussain in Khadija stabbing case

Khadija Siddiqui case

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the arrest of Shah Hussain in the Khadija stabbing case and upheld the five year imprisonment sentence awarded to the culprit by a sessions court.

The victim Khadija Siddique and the accused Shah Hussain appeared before a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Asif Saeed Khosa who termed the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) decision to acquit Hussain null and void.

During the hearing, Justice Khosa remarked, “why was the accused nominated after five days of the incident despite the fact that Khadija knew the culprit well as he was her class fellow.”

The top judge added that if Khadija’s sister was in a conscious state during the entire scene then why did the identification process take time?

The prosecution lawyer contended before the court that according to doctors, Khadija was in a critical condition and the investigation officer could not record her statement.

“It is certain that Khadija was speaking at the hospital and she did inform doctors that the assailant was a boy,” the CJP replied. “There was no wound on her neck’s other side.”

The chief justice further questioned, “how deep are Khadija’s wounds?”, to which her counsel replied saying, “12 wounds were two centimeters deep.”

Khadija’s counsel also relayed to the court that doctors said she was in a critical condition.

“Khadija was speaking in the hospital is a fact,” the CJP added. “The surgeon kicked the doctors out of the room when they started questioning Khadija. She had told the doctors that the attacker was a boy.”

Justice Khosa expressed suspicion over why no bloodstained object was presented from the car. “The investigation officer saying that he saw blood in the car is not enough. Bloodstained car mats or seats were not produced as evidence.”

Expressing dismay, the CJP blamed the investigation officer for not collecting evidence from the crime scene properly.

Khadija’s counsel further informed the court that the driver lodged a first information report (FIR) against the accused but did not name him. To which CJP khosa said, “The driver knew the accused but did not name him. How is it possible that the driver did not know his name when Khadija and Shah Hussain used to meet daily?”

The chief justice then remarked that, “Why did the accused opt for a bail before arrest when his name was not included in the FIR?”

He added that, “the driver named Hussain as the culprit after Khadija’s statement.” Justice Khosa also went on to question about the DNA test of the hair found in Khadija’s car. To which Khadija’s lawyer replied saying, “The hair were sent to a forensic lab but according to them, they did not receive anything.”

 

Check Also

highways

Prime Minister gives orders to open all highways for the supply of goods

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan ordered all national highways to be opened to eliminate barriers …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *